Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39764127›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Integration of RNA Editing with Multiomics Data Improves Machine Learning Models for Predicting Drug Responses in Breast Cancer Patients.

Yanara A Bernal, Alejandro Blanco, Karen Oróstica, Iris Delgado, Ricardo Armisén

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02022202 (Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02022202 completednot on this map

Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY)

TypeobservationalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2012 to 2020Enrolled140ConditionsInvasive Breast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanara A BernalUniversidad del Desarrollo.
Alejandro BlancoUniversidad del Desarrollo.
Karen OrósticaUniversidad de Talca.
Iris DelgadoUniversidad del Desarrollo.
Ricardo ArmisénUniversidad del Desarrollo.

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI BRISCOE, LYNN · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Drug Metabolizing EnzymesU19GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2010 to 2014
$15.8M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF PHASE II DRUG METABOLIZING ENZYMESU01GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2000 to 2009
$15.7M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400008CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003INCI NIH HHS N01 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061388NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The integration of conventional omics data such as genomics and transcriptomics data into artificial intelligence models has advanced significantly in recent years; however, their low applicability in clinical contexts, due to the high complexity of models, has been limited in their direct use inpatients. We integrated classic omics, including DNA mutation and RNA gene expression, added a novel focus on promising omics methods based on A>I(G) RNA editing, and developed a drug response prediction model. Methods: We analyzed 104 patients from the Breast Cancer Genome-Guided Therapy Study (NCT02022202). This study was used to train (70%) with 10-fold cross-validation and test (30%) the drug response classification models. We assess the performance of the random forest (RF), generalized linear model (GLM), and support vector machine (SVM) with the Caret package in classifying therapy response via various combinations of clinical data, tumoral and germline mutation data, gene expression data, and RNA editing data via the LASSO and PCA strategies. Results: First, we characterized the cohort on the basis of clinical data, mutation landscapes, differential gene expression, and RNAediting sites in 69 nonresponders and 35 responders to therapy. Second, regarding the prediction models, we demonstrated that RNA editing data improved or maintained the performance of the RF model for predicting drug response across all combinations. To select the final model, we compared the Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential of RNA editing as a valuable addition to predictive modeling for drug response in patients with breast cancer. The nonresponse risk score could represent a tool for clinical translation, offering a probability-based assessment of therapy response. These findings suggest that incorporating RNA editing into predictive models could enhance personalized treatment strategies and improve decision-making in oncology.

Indexed as

ADARbreast cancerdrug responsemachine learningmultiomic integrationpredictionrandom forestRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID39764127
PMCPMC11702790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.