ArticleResearch square2024
Impact of Differentiated Service Delivery Models on Quality of Life among People living with HIV in Uganda - A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Differentiated service delivery (DSD) models in resource-limited settings have reduced strain on health services and improved client experience, retention and viral suppression, but little is known about the impact of HIV DSD models on quality of life (QoL), which is essential for optimizing person-centered care. This study assessed the impact of DSD models on QoL, loss to follow-up (LTFU), and mortality among persons living with HIV (PLHIV) on ART over time at a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda. Methods: We analyzed records of 1,000 PLHIV who had been on ART for 10 years and followed up for eight years, starting in 2014 or 2015 at the Infectious Diseases Institute clinic in Kampala, Uganda. The primary outcome, QoL, was assessed using an adapted Medical Outcomes Study (MOS-HIV) tool. Secondary outcomes included sustained viral suppression (< 200 copies/mL), all-cause mortality, and loss to follow-up or LTFU (missing clinic visits for ≥ 3 months). Outcomes were compared across three DSD models-fast-track drug refill (FTDR), facility-based groups (FBG), and a composite model combining FTDR and FBG against the facility-based individual management (FBIM), the standard of care (SOC). Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to achieve comparability in measured covariates across the DSD models followed by mixed effects modeling. Robustness of results was checked using G-computation analysis. Results: Of 1,000 records for PLHIV, 980 were analyzed. 62% were female and 95% virally suppressed at baseline. After eight years of follow-up, participants on DSD models had higher QoL (90.4% vs 89.1%; weighted mean ratio 3.66, 95% CI 2.10-6.37, p-value < 0.001), better sustained viral suppression, lower mortality, and reduced LTFU rates compared to SOC. Conclusion: These findings support the broader adoption of DSD models in delivering ART across HIV programs to enhance the QoL and clinical outcomes among PLHIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.