ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Personalization of Closed-Chain Shoulder Models Yields High Kinematic Accuracy for Multiple Motions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shoulder joint complex is prone to musculoskeletal issues, such as rotator cuff-related pain, which affect two-thirds of adults and often result in suboptimal treatment outcomes. Current musculoskeletal models used to understand shoulder biomechanics are limited by challenges in personalization, inaccuracies in predicting joint and muscle loads, and an inability to simulate anatomically accurate motions. To address these deficiencies, we developed a novel, personalized modeling framework capable of calibrating subject-specific joint centers and functional axes for the shoulder complex. Leveraging in vivo biplane fluoroscopy data and the recent Joint Model Personalization Tool from the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline, we optimized joint parameters and body scale factors for shoulder models with varying degrees of freedom (DOFs). We initially created and tested open-chain scapula-only models (3DOF, 4DOF, and 5DOF) and found that increasing DOFs improved accuracy, with the 5 DOF model yielding the lowest marker distance errors (average = 0.8 mm, maximum = 5.2 mm) as compared to biplane fluorscopy data of the scapula across eight movement trials. We subsequently created closed-chain shoulder models incorporating scapula, clavicle, and humerus bodies. We found closed-chain shoulder models with 5 DOFs for the scapula achieved the highest accuracy (average = 0.9 mm, maximum = 5.7 mm) and showed consistent performance across subjects (n=3) in leave-one-out cross-validation tests (average marker distance errors = 1.0 to 1.4 mm). This framework minimizes errors in joint kinematics and provides a foundation for future models incorporating personalized musculature and advanced simulations, enhancing its potential clinical utility for rehabilitation and surgical planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.