ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Sensory origin of visually evoked activity in auditory cortex: evidence for true cross-modal processing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The meaning and functions of cross-modal sensory processing in the cortex is at the center of an ongoing debate. While some studies claim that such responses reflect genuine multisensory integration, others argue they are mere artifacts of stimulus-evoked movement or changes in internal state. We examined this issue by measuring face movements and neural activity in awake mouse primary auditory cortex (A1) and primary visual cortex (V1) during visual and auditory stimulation. Visual stimuli rarely evoked face movements, A1 responses to visual input remained robust even in the absence of movement, and optogenetic silencing of V1 reduced A1 visual responses, confirming a sensory origin of these cross-modal responses. These findings directly challenge the argument that cross- modal responses are purely movement-driven and emphasize that rather than assuming all cross-modal effects are artifactual, researchers must rigorously test each case. Highlights: Unlike auditory stimuli, visual stimuli rarely evoke face movementsFace movements explain sound-evoked firing in VC but not visually evoked firing in ACSilencing VC suppresses visually evoked firing in ACThese results confirm a sensory (rather than motor) origin of these responses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.