Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Identification and experimental validation of diagnostic and prognostic genes CX3CR1, PID1 and PTGDS in sepsis and ARDS using bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analysis and machine learning.

Jijin Jiang, Yan Chen, Yue Su, Li Zhang, Hao Qian, Xinmiao Song, Jin-Fu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jijin Jiang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yan Chen *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yue Su *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Hao QianDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xinmiao SongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jin-Fu XuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is an uncontrolled reaction to infection that causes severe organ dysfunction and is a primary cause of ARDS. Patients suffering both sepsis and ARDS have a poor prognosis and high mortality. However, the mechanisms behind their simultaneous occurrence are unclear. Methods: We acquired sepsis and ARDS datasets from GEO and Arrayexpress databases and screened hub genes by WGCNA and machine learning algorithm. For diagnosis and prognosis, ROC curve and survival analysis were used. We performed GO, KEGG, GSEA, immune cell infiltration, drug prediction, molecular docking, transcription factor prediction, and constructed PPI and ceRNA networks to explore these genes and the common mechanisms of sepsis and ARDS. Single-cell data analysis compared immune cell profiles and hub gene localization. Finally, RT-qPCR and H&E staining confirmed the reliability of hub genes using PBMCs samples and mouse models. Results: We identified 242 common differentially expressed genes in sepsis and ARDS. WGCNA analysis showed that the turquoise module in GSE95233 is strongly linked to sepsis occurrence and poor prognosis, while the black module in GSE10474 is associated with ARDS. Using WGCNA and three machine learning methods (LASSO, random forest and Boruta), we identified three key genes CX3CR1, PID1 and PTGDS. Models built with them showed high AUC values in ROC curve evaluations and were validated by external datasets, accurately predicting the occurrence and mortality. We further explored the immunological landscape of these genes using immune infiltration and single-cell analysis. Then, the ceRNA, predicted drugs and molecular docking were analyzed. Ultimately, we demonstrated that these genes are expressed differently in human and mouse samples with sepsis and ARDS. Conclusion: This study identified three molecular signatures (CX3CR1, PID1 and PTGDS) linked to the diagnosis and poor prognosis of sepsis and ARDS, validated by RT-qPCR and H&E staining in both patient and mouse samples. This research may be valuable for identifying shared biological mechanisms and potential treatment targets for both diseases.

Indexed as

CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1Gene Expression ProfilingMachine LearningRespiratory Distress SyndromeSepsisSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsBiomarkersGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrognosisTranscriptomeBiomarkersCX3C Chemokine Receptor 1CX3CR1 protein, humanARDSdiagnosismachine learningprognosissepsissingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID39763654
PMCPMC11700820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.