ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Environmental Mixtures Analysis (E-MIX) Workflow and Methods Repository.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human exposure to complex, changing, and variably correlated mixtures of environmental chemicals has presented analytical challenges to epidemiologists and human health researchers. There have been a wide variety of recent advances in statistical methods for analyzing mixtures data, with most of these methods having open-source software for implementation. However, there is no one-size-fits-all method for analyzing mixtures data given the considerable heterogeneity in scientific focus and study design. For example, some methods focus on predicting the overall health effect of a mixture and others seek to disentangle main effects and pairwise interactions. Some methods are only appropriate for cross-sectional designs, while other methods can accommodate longitudinally measured exposures or outcomes. This article focuses on greatly simplifying the daunting task of identifying which methods are most suitable for a particular study design, data type, and scientific focus. With this goal in mind, we present an organized workflow for statistical analysis considerations in environmental mixtures data. This systematic strategy builds on epidemiological and statistical principles, considering specific nuances for the mixtures' context. We also describe an accompanying online methods repository in development to increase awareness of and inform application of existing methods and new methods as they are developed and identify gaps in existing methods warranting further development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.