ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
A Novel Playbook for Pragmatic Trial Operations to Monitor and Evaluate Ambient Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06517082 (An EHR-embedded Pragmatic Stepped-wedge Individual Randomized Clinical Trial of Ambient Artificial Intelligence to Improve Provider Well-Being), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An EHR-embedded Pragmatic Stepped-wedge Individual Randomized Clinical Trial of Ambient Artificial Intelligence to Improve Provider Well-Being
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to reduce documentation burden and improve efficiency through clinical note generation. Widespread adoption, however, remains limited due to challenges in electronic health record (EHR) integration, coding compliance, and real-world evaluation. This study introduces a framework and protocols to design, monitor, and deploy ambient AI within routine care. Methods: We launched an implementation phase to build technical workflows, establish governance, and inform a pragmatic randomized trial. A bi-directional governance model linked operations and research through multidisciplinary workgroups that incorporated the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework. Integration into the EHR used Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), and a real-time dashboard tracked utilization and documentation accuracy. To monitor drift, a difference-in-differences analysis was applied to three process metrics: time in notes, work outside of work, and utilization. Audits of ICD-10 compliance were performed using an internally-developed large language model (LLM), whose validity was assessed via correlation with certified professional coders. Results: Ambient AI utilization, measured as the proportion of eligible clinical notes completed using the system, had a weighted median of 65.4% (IQR, 50.6% to 84.0%). Iterative improvement cycles targeted task-specific adoption. A brief workflow issue related to a note template change initially reduced ICD-10 documentation accuracy from 79% (95% CI: 72%-86%) to 35% (95% CI: 28%-42%); accuracy returned to baseline after note template redesign and user training. The internally developed LLM coder achieved a strong correlation with professional coders (Pearson's r = 0.97). The trial enrolled 66 providers across 8 specialties, powered at 90% for the primary outcome on provider well-being. Conclusions: We provide a publicly-available framework and protocols to help safely implement ambient AI in healthcare. Innovations include an embedded pragmatic trial design, human factors engineering, compliance-driven feedback loops, and real-time monitoring to support deployment, ensuring fidelity before initiation of the clinical trial. ClinicalTrialsgov ID: NCT06517082.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.