Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763529›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Retention and Disengagement After Initiation on Antiretroviral Therapy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries After the Introduction of Universal Test and Treat Policies.

Amy Zheng, Emma M Kileel, Alana T Brennan, David B Flynn, Sydney Rosen, Matthew P Fox

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy Zheng
Emma M Kileel
Alana T Brennan
David B Flynn
Matthew P Fox

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We previously published a systematic review evaluating retention in care after antiretroviral therapy treatment initiation among adults in low- and middle-income countries. We estimated retention at 36 months to be at 74% for studies published from 2008-2013. This review evaluates retention after the implementation of Universal Test and Treat in 2015. Methods: We searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE for studies published between January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023 and searched conference abstract repositories from AIDS, IAS, and CROI from 2015-2023. Retention for each study was estimated using 1) simple averages and 2) interpolated for missing timepoints through the last reported timepoint. All-cause attrition for all participants who initiated first-line treatment in low- and middle-income countries was estimated. Overall retention rates were estimated using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit distribution using the interpolated data. Results: A total of 65 studies met our criteria for inclusion for the systematic review. Most studies came from Africa with very few from Europe and Asia. Very few studies reported retention past the first 12 months following treatment initiation. Across all studies, we estimated simple average retention with no interpolation of missing timepoints to be 72.6% at 12 months, 73.2%, at 24 months, 59.8% at 36 months, and 49.4% at 48 months. Utilizing a GLMM model, we estimated retention to be 86.0% at 6 months, 80.0% at 12 months, 82.0% at 24 months, 71.0% at 36 months, and 57.0% at 48 months. In comparison, our prior review conducted in 2015, estimated retention rates to be 91.0% at 6 months, 86.0% at 12 months, 79.0% at 24 months, 75% at 36 months, and 69% at 48 months. These results generally reflect retention at the initiating facility and omit the effect of unreported transfers. Conclusions: Retention in care at 36 months was estimated to be between 60% and 71%. Compared to results from our prior review, retention has stayed largely similar in the post-UTT era. Further research evaluating retention in other geographic areas (i.e., Latin America and the Caribbean, Europe, and Asia) is needed. Funding: ATB and EK was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases K01DK116929. SR was supported by INV-031690 from the Gates Foundation to Boston University. AZ was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 1F31AI179292-01A1. Research reported in this publication is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01MH121998. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Identifiers

PMID39763529
PMCPMC11702746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.