ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024
Long-term prescription opioid use following surgery in the US (2017-2022): a population-based study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-discharge opioid prescribing after surgery in the United States: a population-based analysis of specialty variation and prescribing intensity.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Trajectories, and Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use in a Swiss University Hospital: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Surgical Low-Value Care Between Fee-For-Service and Salaried Health Care Systems.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Targeting NaBritish journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Prescription opioid use and substance use disorder in US women (2006-2022): a retrospective cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Reduction in chronic post-surgical opioid utilization in the USA: 2020-2022 vs. 2017-2019.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the last decade, numerous efforts have been made to combat the opioid crisis globally. The impact of these strategies has not been adequately measured and may differ across populations depending on baseline risk. We compared changes in long-term prescription opioid use following surgery within a national US cohort, between 2017 and 2022. Methods: We used TRICARE claims data to identify individuals undergoing one of 14 representative surgical procedures. The rate of post-operative long-term prescription opioid use during 2020-22 was compared to 2017-19. We used modified Poisson regression analyses to adjust for confounding. We performed secondary analyses that accounted for interactions between the time period and race, pre-operative opioid use, surgical care setting and our proxy for socioeconomic status. Findings: Our data derived from TRICARE claims. We included 410,326 surgical events. Across both time periods, there were 213,212 females (52%), with a median age of 53 (IQR 22) and 207,188 individuals of White race (50%). The median co-morbidity index was 0 (IQR = 0). The rate of long-term post-operative opioid use was 11% in 2017-19, which reduced to 6% in 2020-22 (risk ratio [RR] 0.51; 95% CI 0.50, 0.52). Reductions were appreciated across all census divisions in the US and across all racial minorities, those of lower socioeconomic background and pre-operative chronic opioid users. Following multivariable analysis, there was a significant reduction in long-term prescription opioid use (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.60, 0.63) after surgery in 2020-22 as compared to 2017-19. Interpretation: This investigation represents one of the largest and most comprehensive longitudinal assessments of opioid use following surgery. We found clinically relevant reductions in post-operative prescription opioid use in 2020-22 as compared to 2017-19. Given the representative nature of the study cohort, we believe these results are reflective of national trends. Funding: U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Health Agency (award # HU00012120089).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.