Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763493›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024

The response of health systems to the needs of migrants and refugees in the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative case study between Mexico, Colombia and Peru.

Ietza Bojorquez, Andres Cubillos-Novella, Juan Arroyo-Laguna, Luis Alberto Martinez-Juarez, Ana Cristina Sedas, Oscar Franco-Suarez, Zuly Suárez-Morales, Edith Adame-Avilés, Marcela Barragán-León, Angela Suarez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ietza BojorquezDepartamento de Estudios de Población, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Km. 18.5 Carretera Escénica Tijuana-Ensenada, Tijuana, Baja California, CP 22560, Mexico.
Andres Cubillos-NovellaInstituto de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cra 7 No. 40-62, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Arroyo-LagunaDepartamento Académico de Ciencias Sociales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Avenida Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, 15088, Lima, Perú.
Luis Alberto Martinez-JuarezCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ana Cristina SedasDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, MA 02115, USA.
Oscar Franco-SuarezInstituto de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cra 7 No. 40-62, Bogotá, Colombia.
Zuly Suárez-MoralesInstituto de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cra 7 No. 40-62, Bogotá, Colombia.
Edith Adame-AvilésUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Plan of Combined Studies in Medicine (PECEM-MD/PhD), Faculty of Medicine, Av. Universidad 3004, Copilco Universidad, Coyoacán, 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Marcela Barragán-LeónDepartamento Académico de Ciencias Sociales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Avenida Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, 15088, Lima, Perú.
Angela SuarezJohns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Miriam OrcuttInstitute for Global Health, University College, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, United Kingdom.
Paul SpiegelCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Protecting the health of migrants and refugees during the pandemic was a significant challenge in the Latin American region. We aimed to describe and contrast the response of the health systems of Mexico, Colombia and Perú to migrants' and refugees' health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to situate the response in the context of the migration and health policies of each country. Methods: We conducted case studies of the three countries. The data collected for each case included: 1) policy documents; 2) peer-reviewed and grey literature; 3) qualitative interviews with key informants. Findings: The three countries issued policies to detect COVID-19 cases among migrants and refugees, and granted them access to COVID-19 care regardless of their migration status or facilitated regularization as a way to improve access to care. However, other health care needs were not considered, some groups of migrants remained invisible in the policies, and policies rarely considered the increased social and economic vulnerability of migrants and refugees during this period. Pre-existing barriers to care were made worse during the pandemic. All three countries' response to migrants was reliant on non-governmental organizations, with international cooperation being especially active in Colombia, and local civil society organizations in Mexico. Interpretation: The response of each country was a continuation of their previous approach to migration and health. Developing plans for pandemic response that consider migrants and refugees' particular needs will be important to improve response capacities in the future. Funding: Funding was provided by USA for the International Organization for Migration (IOM) under an agreement with the Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health systemsLatin AmericaMigrationPandemicRefugees

Identifiers

PMID39763493
PMCPMC11703576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.