Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763460›Full record

SynthesisActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2024

A critical update on endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Luca Giovanni Locatello, Enrico Redolfi De Zan, Nicole Caiazza, Anna Tarantini, Paolo Lanzetta, Cesare Miani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca Giovanni Locatello *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Enrico Redolfi De Zan *Department of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Nicole CaiazzaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Anna TarantiniDepartment of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Cesare MianiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) is becoming a workhorse in the management of distal lacrimal duct obstruction. It yields success rates comparable to external DCR, with the advantage of no external scars. However, it requires multidisciplinary expertise and many uncertainties in terms of proper indications, technique, and perioperative management still exist. Methods: Systematic review of the literature in the last 5 years using PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: A total of 66 articles were included. Many technical modifications and surgical refinements have been proposed, but a formal comparison of the various techniques is hampered by methodological heterogeneity. The use of local anaesthesia and perioperative adjunctive techniques to reduce the risk of restenosis are also gaining popularity even if the level of evidence remains weak. Conclusions: Endo-DCR offers satisfactory clinical outcomes even though there are many grey areas that need to be addressed in future high-quality studies.

Indexed as

DacryocystorhinostomyEndoscopyHumansdacryocystorhinostomyDCRendoscopic dacryocystorhinostomylacrimal duct obstructionrhinology

Identifiers

PMID39763460
PMCPMC11706521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.