Observational studyClinical rehabilitation2025
Factors associated with aspects of functioning one year after hospitalization due to COVID-19.
Observational study in Clinical rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Pulmonary Function in the PURE-Colombia Cohort: A Comparative Analysis with Pre-COVID Values and Non-COVID-19 Controls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo identify factors, present at 3 months after COVID-19 that are associated with the level of functioning 1 year after hospitalization.DesignMulticenter prospective observational study.SettingRegion Västra Götaland Sweden.ParticipantsPatients ≥ 18 years of age who were followed regarding body functions and activities 3 months and 1 year after discharge from a hospitalization for COVID-19.Main measuresPatient-reported outcome measures at 3 months and 1 year, a clinical follow-up at 1 year, and clinical information retrieved from medical charts.ResultsIn total 169 participants were included in the analysis, including 113 males (67%). The mean patient age was 66 (standard deviation (SD) 13, range 21-95). One year after hospitalization, 50 (34%) participants were under the normative value for forced vital capacity and 57 (39%) were under normative value for forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The mean walking distance was 441 m (SD 118 m) in the 6-minute walking test, and 62 (40%) patients reported mobility problems. Older age, female sex, and more self-reported symptoms of physical fatigue were significantly associated with lower levels of functioning 1 year after COVID-19. The initial severity of COVID-19 did not significantly influence functioning at 1 year.ConclusionPreviously hospitalized individuals with respiratory difficulties 1 year after COVID-19 may present acceptable lung function on spirometry but be close to their maximal functional performance. The findings highlight the need for in-depth assessments to identify rehabilitation needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.