Trial reportEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
Superior efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac compared to intravenous tramadol for acute renal colic in northern Thai patients: A randomised double-blind, sham-controlled trial.
Trial report in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aimed to compare time to effective pain relief between diclofenac 75 mg intramuscular (IM) and tramadol 50 mg intravenous (IV) for ED patients with acute renal colic.
methodsA randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled, superiority trial was conducted. Patients diagnosed with acute renal colic (hydronephrosis and/or stone visualisation on point-of-care ultrasound) in the ED were randomly assigned to receive an IM injection of 75 mg of diclofenac or IV tramadol 50 mg. Pain relief was defined as a numerical rating scale reduction of two or more points (standard 0-10 scale) and a reduction of at least one level of pain transition question ('much better', 'little better', 'unchanged', 'little worse', 'much worse'). The primary outcome was the multivariable-adjusted subdistribution-hazard ratio (SHRs) within 120 min in the ED, estimated using the cumulative incidence function (CIF). The secondary outcome compared the average time to pain relief using the restricted mean survival time (RMST).
resultsA total of 68 patients were randomised, with 34 patients allocated to each group. At the 120 min, pain relief was reported in diclofenac and tramadol, 32 (94%) and 22 (65%) patients respectively. SHR was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.80-4.55; P value <0.001). For diclofenac and tramadol, the RMSTs were 37.09 min (95% CI: 30.00, 44.15) and 78.74 min (95% CI: 66.49, 90.99) respectively, with the difference of 41.67 min (95% CI: 55.71, 27.62).
conclusionDiclofenac 75 mg IM provides faster effective pain relief compared with tramadol 50 mg IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.