ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2025
Ventricular Septal Rupture as a Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Comparison of Different Treatment Methods.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis research aimed to investigate the clinical features exhibited by individuals diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and to compare the prognostic outcomes of different treatment modalities.
methodsA retrospective study on a cohort of 200 patients who were diagnosed with AMI complicated by VSR at a specialized medical facility from 2018 to 2023 was conducted. The patients were categorized into 3 different treatment groups: group A received medical management, group B underwent surgical repair, and group C underwent percutaneous device closure. Our primary objective was to assess the overall mortality rate within 1 year, while secondary objectives included evaluating in-hospital mortality, mortality within 30 days, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year.
resultsGroup A showed the highest in-hospital mortality rate of 37.3%. The rate for group B was only 20.6%, while group C exhibited the lowest rate of 17.4%. A similar tendency was observed for the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. The 30-day mortality rate for group A, group B, and group C was 56.9%, 20.6%, and 22.1%, respectively. The 1-year mortality rate for group A, group B, and group C was as follows: 31.4%, 28.6%, and 25.6%. In addition, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was highest in group A (56.9%), followed by group B (28.6%) and group C (32.6%).
conclusionBoth surgical repair and percutaneous device closure were associated with significantly better survival outcomes compared to medical management alone in patients with AMI complicated by VSR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.