Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39763204›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2025

Modern Digital Query Analytics of Patient Education Materials on Acanthosis Nigricans: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.

Kevin Johny Varghese, Som Singh, Emily Kamali, Fahad Qureshi, Aleena Jamal, Fawad Qureshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin Johny VargheseDivision of Dermatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 2060 W 39th Ave, Kansas City, KS, 66103, United States, 1 8164041000.ORCID 0009-0004-6067-9921
Som SinghDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7553-8487
Emily KamaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2449-3781
Fahad QureshiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-1350
Aleena JamalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3946-6986
Fawad QureshiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-4882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Online digital materials are integral to patient education and health care outcomes in dermatology. Acanthosis nigricans (AN) is a common condition, often associated with underlying diseases such as insulin resistance. Patients frequently search the internet for information related to this cutaneous finding. To our knowledge, the quality of online educational materials for AN has not been systematically examined. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to profile the readability and quality of the content of publicly available digital educational materials on AN and identify questions frequently asked by patients. Methods: This study analyzed publicly available internet sources to identify the most frequent questions searched by patients regarding AN using the Google Rankbrain algorithm. Furthermore, available articles on AN were evaluated for quality and reading level using metrics such as the Brief DISCERN score, and readability was determined using three specific scales including the Flesch-Kincaid score, Gunning Fog index, and the Coleman-Liau index, based on literature. Results: Patients most frequently accessed facts on AN from government sources, which comprised 30% (n=15) of the analyzed sources. The available articles did not meet quality standards and were at a reading level not appropriate for the general public. The majority of articles (n=29/50, 58%) had substandard Brief DISCERN scores, failing to meet the criteria for good quality. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of the paucity of valuable online educational material on AN and educate their patients accordingly.

Indexed as

Acanthosis NigricansComprehensionInternetPatient Education as TopicHealth LiteracyHumansacanthosis nigricansdermatologyDISCERNgeneral publicinformation behaviorinformation resourceinformation seekingpatient educationpublic healthreadabilityreading levelskin

Identifiers

PMID39763204
PMCPMC11728197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.