ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Improving accuracy in the estimation of probable dementia in racially and ethnically diverse groups with penalized regression and transfer learning.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological innovations in studying marginalized populations in research on neurodegeneration and ageing.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Algorithmic estimations of dementia status are widely used in public health and epidemiologic research, but inadequate algorithm performance across racial/ethnic groups has been a barrier. We present improvements in the accuracy of group-specific "probable dementia" estimation using a transfer learning approach. Transfer learning involves combining models trained on a large "source" data set with imprecise outcome assessments, alongside models trained on a smaller "target" data set with high-quality outcome assessments. Transfer learning improves model accuracy by leveraging large-source data while refining estimations with smaller, target data. We illustrate with data from the Health and Retirement Study (source data: n = 6630) and the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (target data: n = 2388). Models for dementia status estimation were evaluated through overall accuracy (Brier score), calibration (intercept, slope), and discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUR] and area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC]). The transfer-learned algorithm showed higher accuracy compared to the best previously reported algorithm among both non-Hispanic Black participants (Brier 0.049 vs 0.061; AUC 0.84 vs 0.81; AUPRC 0.52 vs 0.39) and Hispanic participants (Brier 0.052 vs 0.056; AUC 0.89 vs 0.87; AUPRC 0.61 vs 0.56). Transfer learning can improve dementia status estimation for groups historically underrepresented in research. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.