ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
A laboratory feasibility study using a computer algorithm for anastomosis segmentation of epicardial ultrasonography images from distal coronary artery bypass anastomoses.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02919124 (During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. A Feasibility Study.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. A Feasibility Study.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) depends on several factors, including the quality of the distal anastomoses to the coronary arteries. Early graft failure may be caused by, e.g., technical suture failures, and such failures may be detected using intraoperative quality assessment. High-intensity epicardial ultrasonography (ECUS) allows anatomical visualization of the anastomoses during surgery, but currently, the images must be assessed manually. Here, we aim to describe an automatic quality assessment of distal coronary anastomoses using in-house software for vessel area and diameter extraction.
methodsA postoperative, laboratory, investigational feasibility study comparing computer readings of longitudinal and transverse ultrasonographic images of distal coronary artery anastomoses with manual readings was performed, including ECUS images from 30 patients undergoing elective, isolated on-pump CABG. Vessel and anastomosis segmentation performance metrics from images obtained intraoperatively were compared to assess agreement between the manual and automatic segmentation methods. Scatter plots, the Dice coefficient and correlation analyses were used as measures of similarity between the two readings. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsThe number of dimensions of anastomotic vessel structures that are relevant for stenosis quantification and the Dice coefficient were 0.888 between the automatic and manual segmentations. The correlation coefficient between the manual and automatic stenotic rates was 0.674.
conclusionsAn anastomosis segmentation software for automatic and objective extraction of the anatomical dimensions of relevant distal coronary anastomotic structures from ECUS images obtained during CABG was developed. The framework allows for quantifying stenotic in the anastomotic structures and has the potential to assist surgeons during quality assessment of coronary anastomoses when the described segmentation of vessels and anastomoses is available for real-time epicardial ultrasonography use during surgery.
trial registrationThe study was registered on September 29, 2016, before enrolment of the first participant (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02919124).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.