ArticleBMC nursing2025
Exploring the relationship between facilitating factors and adherence to nursing ethical standards.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assess the level of adherence to nursing ethical principles among nurses at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Saqqez in 2024.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Article
- Relational Agency and Ethical Professionalism Among Long-Term Care Workers: Evidence from Taiwan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethical behavior profiles among nursing interns and their determinants: a latent profile analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProfessional ethics is a cornerstone of the nursing profession, with its observance closely linked to the enhancement of nursing services and the satisfaction of service recipients. This study aimed to assess nurses' compliance with professional ethical codes and its relationship with factors that facilitate such compliance.
methodsThis descriptive-analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 in a hospital located in southern Iran. A total of 312 nurses were selected using the census method and participated in the study. Data were collected through researcher-designed questionnaires that assessed compliance with professional ethical codes and factors facilitating such compliance. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 23, employing t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression.
resultsThe mean scores for compliance with professional ethical codes and factors facilitating compliance were 127.94 ± 8.52 (out of 170) and 98.31 ± 6.22 (out of 180), respectively. Nurse-related factors (β = 0.323, p < 0.001), patient-related factors (β = 0.286, p = 0.002), and management factors (β = 0.277, p = 0.003) emerged as significant predictors of compliance with professional ethical codes. Significant differences in compliance scores were observed based on gender (p = 0.01), marital status (p = 0.02), level of education (p = 0.04), and the number of patients under observation per work shift (p = 0.03). Additionally, the mean score of factors facilitating compliance with ethical codes was higher among female nurses (p = 0.03) compared to male nurses.
conclusionCompliance with professional ethical codes was rated as acceptable, while the factors facilitating compliance were rated as moderate. Given the predictive role of facilitating factors, targeted improvements in these areas could significantly enhance nurses' adherence to professional ethical codes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.