ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived Barriers and Supports to Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study of Patients with and without a Zero-Dollar Copay Health Plan Benefit.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains a pressing public health concern. Despite advancements in antidiabetic medications, suboptimal medication adherence persists among many individuals with T2D, often due to the high cost of medications. To combat this issue, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana (Blue Cross) introduced the $0 Drug Copay (ZDC) program, providing $0 copays for select drugs. This study sought to explore barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of Blue Cross's ZDC program (updated version).
methodsFocus group discussions and interviews were conducted with health plan leadership, health coaches and providers who participate in the health plan organization's healthcare quality improvement program. Focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and July 2023. Discussion guides were developed collaboratively and tailored to each participant group. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo
resultsIn total, 15 participants were interviewed: 6 were Blue Cross administrators, 5 were health coaches and 4 were Quality Blue providers. Overall, participants had positive feedback on the ZDC program and perceived that it has significant benefits for patients and the health system but could be improved, and four themes related to implementation barriers and facilitators, effectiveness and potential areas of improvement were identified: (1) the ZDC program reduces friction for patients, prescribers and the health system; (2) the program is aligned with the values of health systems, insurers and providers, facilitating implementation success; (3) expanding coverage (drug classes and conditions) and education (for providers and patients) could maximize program benefits; and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) did not negatively impact program administration because the $0 copay was programmed at the benefit level.
conclusionsThe ZDC program aligns goals and can benefit patients, providers and patients. The program can have the largest potential if it is expanded to include new medications and new conditions, and if there is more education for patients and providers. Regardless of challenges, reduced-copay programs have the potential to improve medication adherence, improve HbA1C control and improve overall health outcomes. Trial Registration This study was approved by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board, IRB #2020-1986.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.