Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762858›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2025

Drivers of HIV self-test kit among Tanzanian men aged 15-49: findings from the 2022 TDHS-MIS cross-sectional study.

Mbwiga Sote Aloni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mbwiga Sote AloniDepartment of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Mkwawa University College of Education, Iringa, Tanzania. mbwiga.aloni@muce.ac.tz.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-6974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe introduction of the HIV self-test kit in the early 2000s was a major breakthrough in combating HIV. This study determines the social demographic and sexual behaviour driving the use of HIV self-test kits.

methodThe study used secondary data obtained from Tanzania DHS-MIS 2022. The survey uses a stratified two-stage sample design. The first stage involved the selection of clusters consisting of enumeration areas, and in the second stage of sampling, 26 households were selected from each cluster.

resultsThe mean age = 28.6 years. Usage of HIV self-test kits was found to be low (3.9%). The odds of using HIV self-test kits were 2.2 and 6.6 times more likely among those with primary (aOR = 2.2, 95%CI = 2.2-2.3) and secondary (aOR = 6.6, 95%CI 6.6-6.7) education compared to those without education respectively. As age increases, the odds of using HIV self-test kits increases. Men residing in rural areas were about 40% less likely to use HIV self-test kits compared to those dwelling in urban areas (aOR = 0.6, P < 0.0001).

conclusionSignificant demographic and sexual behaviour factors associated with the usage of HIV self-test kits include sex of household head, education level, marital status, wealth status, age, ever heard of sexually transmitted infection and condom use during sexual intercourse. HIV self-test kits were used more in urban areas than in rural areas. It is essential to raise awareness and improve access to HIV self-test kits for less informed populations, such as those living in rural areas.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-TestingSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedReagent Kits, DiagnosticRural PopulationTanzaniaUrban PopulationYoung AdultReagent Kits, DiagnosticDemographic factorsHIV self-test kitLogistic regressionMenSexual behaviour factorsTanzaniaUsage

Identifiers

PMID39762858
PMCPMC11706052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.