ArticleRespiratory research2025
Outcome and safety 90 days after combined airway valve treatment of the right upper and middle lobes in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn COPD patients with severe right-sided emphysema, complete major and incomplete minor fissure, implantation of one-way valves in both the right upper (RUL) and middle lobes (ML) is a possible approach for endoscopic lung volume reduction. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the response to therapy and the complication rate at 90 days (90d-FU) after combined RUL-ML valve implantation.
methodsThis retrospective, monocentric study included all patients from the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg who underwent RUL-ML valve treatment between 2012 and 2023 with available follow-up data. Quantitative chest imaging, lung function, 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), complications and indications for re-bronchoscopies until 90d-FU were analysed.
results28 patients underwent combined RUL-ML valve treatment, predominantly sequentially (92.86%, n = 26/28). Neither lung function nor 6MWD improved significantly in the overall cohort. However, in the subgroup with heterogeneous emphysema (71.4%, n = 20/28), FEV1 (Δ = 116.00 mL ± 195.77 mL, p < 0.05) and 6-MWD (Δ = 50.23 ± 69.10 m, p < 0.05) increased significantly at 90d-FU. Consistent with this, the baseline difference in emphysema volume between the RUL + ML and the right lower lobe correlated significantly with the increase in FEV1 at 90d-FU (R = 0.74, p < 0.001). Pneumothorax occurred in 5 cases in 4 patients (14.3%) following ML treatment. Severe pneumonia and/or COPD exacerbations occurred in 32.1% (9/28) of patients.
conclusionsAlthough only studied in a small cohort, our data suggest that combined RUL and ML valve implantation appears to be a promising interventional treatment strategy in patients with severe heterogenous RUL and ML emphysema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.