ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Virtual screening assisted identification of a phytocompound as potent inhibitor against Candida lusitaniae; an in-silico study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repurposing of Clomiphene Citrate and Its Antileishmanial and Antifungal Activities:Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Identification of GPI-Anchored Wall Transfer Protein 1 Modulators for Fungal Infections Through Generative AI and Physics-Based Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based QSAR and molecular modeling of phytocompounds inFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Fused pyrido[3,4-D]pyrimidine moiety with phthalazinone ring accelerate dual inhibition of PARP1 and CDK4 in triple-negative breast cancer: a hybrid design with computational investigation through molecular modeling and quantum mechanics.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candida lusitaniae is one of the fungal species which causes serious health illnesses including peritonitis, vaginitis and fungemia, among others. Several antifungal drugs have been designed to tackle its infections but their efficacy is still questionable due to their associated side effects. Hence, there is a need to design those drugs which possess comparatively higher degree of therapeutic potential. Phytochemicals were selected in this regard because these compounds which satisfactorily follow this criteria as, their therapeutic index is comparatively larger than the synthetic drugs. Considering this fact, different phyto-compounds were opted in this research work to estimate their therapeutic efficiency against the secreted aspartyl proteinase (SAP) of C. lusitaniae since, it assists this pathogen in developing the infections. Initially, the structure of SAP was modelled for subsequent docking analysis. The results of molecular docking suggested that three compounds, opelconazole, daidzin 4'0-glucuronide and naringin exhibited better docking scores. Afterwards, ADME analysis of all these four compounds was performed to comprehend their drug-likeness attributes. The results of ADME analysis revealed that only the daidzin 4'0-glucuronide followed all the required parameters. Lastly, MD simulations were conducted in which top three compounds in context of docking scores along three approved anti-fungal drugs in complex with SAP were incorporated for the comparative analysis. The overall results of MD simulations suggested that daidzin 4'0-glucuronide exhibited comparatively better results. This outcome indicated that this particular compound not only showed better binding affinity with SAP during docking analysis and fulfilled all of the drug-likeness moieties among other compounds but also, displayed better simulation results, leading to a conclusion that daidzin 4'0-glucuronide could be a potential drug candidate against C. lusitaniae. However, its real-time efficacy could only be validated in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.