ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Electronic Health Record Time Allocation Among Primary Care Clinicians at the Veterans Health Administration Using Virtual Observations.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Review
- The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Family Physicians During Simulated Virtual Encounters: Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Usability Challenges in Electronic Health Records: Impact on Documentation Burden and Clinical Workflow: A Scoping Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrior research has shown that primary care clinicians (PCPs) spend a large portion of clinic visits on tasks within the electronic health record (EHR). However, no time allocation studies have been done in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and little is known about EHR time spent during virtual visits.
objectiveTo estimate the proportion of clinician time spent working within the EHR during primary care visits at VHA clinics.
designWe used a time study software (WorkStudy+) adapted from prior research to collect time-motion data via remote observation of in-person and virtual visits.
participants23 PCPs (including physicians and nurse practitioners) from 3 regional VA sites. MAIN MEASURES: Proportion of observed time spent interfacing with the EHR during a primary care visit. KEY
resultsOf 211 primary care visits observed, the average visit length was 23.9 min in-person, 21.2 min by phone, and 29.3 min on video. The percentage of time spent on EHR work during the visit was 35% for in-person visits, 46% for phone visits, and 39% for video visits. During n=39 4-h clinic sessions, PCPs spent 54 min completing administrative tasks between patient visits, with 44% of time spent on documentation, 14% on chart review, and 14% on placing orders.
conclusionsPCPs at the VHA spend between one-third and one-half of each patient visit interfacing with the EHR. Most of this time is spent on documentation and chart review. Less time was spent in the EHR during in-person visits compared to virtual visits, suggesting that clinicians limit EHR task completion when the patient is present. Between patient visits during clinic sessions, PCPs spend 75% of their time working in the EHR. In total, this represents over 2 h per half-day clinic session spent on EHR tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.