ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Organizational Determinants to Hypertension Management: Adapting a Health Equity Framework to Examine Processes at Two Academic Health Systems.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of Successful Implementation: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Team-Based Telehealth Hypertension Management Program for Underserved Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Integrating Legal Aid into HIV Care: Evaluating the Impact of a Medical-Legal Partnership on Viral Suppression Outcomes.AIDS and behavior · 2026Trial
- Utilizing a Health Equity Framework to Explore Patient-Level Factors Impacting Effective Hypertension Management Across Two Academic Health Systems.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypertension management is a national priority. However, hypertension control rates are suboptimal and vary across clinics, even among those in the same health system and geographic region.
objectiveTo identify organizational barriers and facilitators that impact hypertension management at the provider, clinic, and health system level.
designSemi-structured interviews were conducted to assess patient and provider experiences with hypertension care.
participantsTwenty-five providers and 22 patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited from thirteen high- and low-performing primary care clinics across two health systems in North Carolina and Kansas. APPROACH: Interviews were analyzed using both inductive and deductive coding methodologies. A health equity framework scaffolded interview guide design and codebook development, with thematic analysis employed to categorize emergent themes. KEY
resultsParticipants discussed organizational and clinic-level barriers and facilitators that impact hypertension management, with health systems' resource centralization being frequently mentioned. Some participants lauded centralized interventions for improving patient access and increasing touchpoints, while others lamented reductions in clinic staffing to accommodate centralized workflows. Insufficient in-clinic staffing and blood pressure (BP) measurement equipment, limited exam rooms, short appointment duration, and hurried clinic environments were all mentioned as challenges to hypertension management, particularly as they hindered adherence to BP recheck policies. Appointment availability was mentioned as a barrier; however, some providers referenced clinics' use of virtual and/or nurse-specific visits as a mechanism to increase patient access. Multiple providers noted that tasks central to hypertension management, like BP telemonitoring and MyChart correspondence, go unaccounted for on their schedules and can lead to unpaid work, which they linked with increased stress and burnout.
conclusionsPrimary care clinics experience multiple interrelated organizational barriers to effective hypertension management. Future studies should examine the impact of different clinic staffing models, including multidisciplinary care teams, telemedicine, and remote BP monitoring, on BP outcomes in diverse primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.