ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Linea alba support method of prophylactic loop ileostomy via lower abdominal midline incision for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe traditional method of prophylactic loop ileostomy is time-consuming and prone to complications like stoma stenosis, peristomal adhesions, or dermatitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical application value and potential benefits of a novel approach named linea alba support method (LASM) of prophylactic loop ileostomy via lower abdominal midline incision.
methodsThe clinical data of rectal cancer patients admitted to the General Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on different methods for prophylactic loop ileostomy they received, and clinical outcomes were further compared between the two groups.
resultsA total of 102 patients, including 48 patients underwent LASM (LASM group) and 54 patients underwent traditional method (TM group) were included in this study. The LASM group exhibited significantly shorter operative time (201.8 vs. 223.0 min, p = 0.011), ileostomy time (10 vs. 22 min, p < 0.001), the length of postoperative visual incision (5 vs. 8 cm, p < 0.001), and operative time of stoma closure (75 vs. 90 min, p < 0.001) compared to the TM group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative complications and stoma-related complications. In addition, LASM was an independent influencing factor for shorter operative time of ileostomy.
conclusionLASM of prophylactic loop ileostomy via lower abdominal midline incision, seamlessly integrating simplicity, safety, and exceptional cosmetic outcomes, merits extensive promotion and adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39762610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.