Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762561›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2025

Apoptotic priming in senescence predicts specific senolysis by quantitative analysis of mitochondrial dependencies.

Julie A MacDonald, Gary A Bradshaw, Fleur Jochems, René Bernards, Anthony Letai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mitochondrial regulation of cellular senescence heterogeneity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The states of senescent cells.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  12. Senotherapy for chronic lung disease.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie A MacDonaldDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-2722
Gary A BradshawDepartment of Systems Biology, Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fleur JochemsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
René BernardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-3423
Anthony LetaiDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Anthony_Letai@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1993-9013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence contributes to a variety of pathologies associated with aging and is implicated as a cellular state in which cancer cells can survive treatment. Reported senolytic drug treatments act through varying molecular mechanisms, but heterogeneous efficacy across the diverse contexts of cellular senescence indicates a need for predictive biomarkers of senolytic activity. Using multi-parametric analyses of commonly reported molecular features of the senescent phenotype, we assayed a variety of models, including malignant and nonmalignant cells, using several triggers of senescence induction and found little univariate predictive power of these traditional senescence markers to identify senolytic drug sensitivity. We sought to identify novel drug targets in senescent cells that were insensitive to frequently implemented senolytic therapies, such as Navitoclax (ABT-263), using quantitative mass spectrometry to measure changes in the senescent proteome, compared to cells which acquire an acute sensitivity to ABT-263 with senescence induction. Inhibition of the antioxidant GPX4 or the Bcl-2 family member MCL-1 using small molecule compounds in combination with ABT-263 significantly increased the induction of apoptosis in some, but not all, previously insensitive senescent cells. We then asked if we could use BH3 profiling to measure differences in mitochondrial apoptotic priming in these models of cellular senescence and predict sensitivity to the senolytics ABT-263 or the combination of dasatinib and quercetin (D + Q). We found, despite being significantly less primed for apoptosis overall, the dependence of senescent mitochondria on BCL-XL was significantly correlated to senescent cell killing by both ABT-263 and D + Q, despite no significant changes in the gene or protein expression of BCL-XL. However, our data caution against broad classification of drugs as globally senolytic and instead provide impetus for context-specific senolytic targets and propose BH3 profiling as an effective predictive biomarker.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCellular SenescenceMitochondriaSenotherapeuticsAniline CompoundsCell Line, TumorDasatinibHumansMyeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 ProteinSulfonamidesAniline CompoundsDasatinibMyeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 ProteinnavitoclaxSenotherapeuticsSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID39762561
PMCPMC12089506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.