ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Earlier Diagnosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases (Fibrotic ILDs) and Earlier Treatment of Its Progressive Form, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis (PPF).Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in respiratory medicine: From diagnosis to treatment and future directions.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Explainable pulmonary fibrosis detection using edge-strengthened dilated holistic edge detection-based lung segmentation and ResNet-V2 classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Machine learning model development and validation using SHAP: predicting 28-day mortality risk in pulmonary fibrosis patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Ferroptosis in pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis and traditional Chinese medicine-driven therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A scoping review was conducted to investigate the role of radiological imaging, particularly high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing and prognosticating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Relevant studies from the PubMed database were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers assessed study quality and analyzed data, estimating heterogeneity and publication bias. The analysis primarily focused on deep learning approaches for feature extraction from HRCT images, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Radiomics, utilizing quantitative features extracted from images, were computed using various tools to improve precision in analysis. Validation methods such as k-fold cross-validation were employed to assess model robustness and generalizability. Findings revealed that radiologic patterns in interstitial lung disease hold prognostic significance for patient survival. However, the additional prognostic value of quantitative assessment of fibrosis extent remains uncertain. IPF poses a substantial challenge in respiratory medicine, necessitating advanced diagnostic and prognostic tools. Radiomics emerges as a valuable asset, offering insights into disease characteristics and aiding in disease classification. It contributes to understanding underlying pathophysiological processes, facilitating more effective management of pulmonary disorders. Future research should focus on clarifying the additional prognostic value of quantitative assessment and further refining AI-based diagnostic and prognostic models for IPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.