ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive modeling of consecutive intravenous immunoglobulin treatment resistance in Kawasaki disease: A nationwide study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting coronary artery lesions in patients with Kawasaki disease in China using a machine-learning algorithm: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The future of Kawasaki disease management: data-driven innovations from bedside to bench and back again.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Interpretable web-based machine learning model for predicting intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Clinical prediction of intravenous immunoglobulin-resistant Kawasaki disease based on interpretable Transformer model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predictive value of novel nutritional inflammation indexes in IVIG-unresponsive Kawasaki disease: a retrospective study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- IL-10 and IL-2R as combined predictors of intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kawasaki disease (KD) is a leading cause of acquired heart disease in children, often resulting in coronary artery complications such as dilation, aneurysms, and stenosis. While intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is effective in reducing immunologic inflammation, 10-15% of patients do not respond to initial therapy, and some show resistance even after two consecutive treatments. Predicting which patients will not respond to these two IVIG treatments is crucial for guiding treatment strategies and improving outcomes. This study aimed to forecast resistance to two consecutive IVIG treatments using advanced machine learning models based on clinical and laboratory data. Data from the 9th National Kawasaki Disease Patient Survey by the Korean Kawasaki Disease Society encompassing 15,378 patients (mean age 33.0 ± 24.8 months; sex ratio 1.4:1) were used. Clinical and laboratory findings included white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum protein, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and presence of pyuria. Machine learning models, including Logistic Regression (LR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), CATBoost, Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), were applied to predict treatment resistance. The machine learning models achieved Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) values between 0.664 and 0.791, with the GBM model exhibiting the highest AUROC of 0.791. Analysis of feature importance revealed that ANC, serum protein, platelet count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were the most significant predictors of treatment resistance. The cutoff values for these predictors were 7,860/mm³ for ANC, 7.0 g/dL for serum protein, 519,000/mm³ for platelet count, and 10.4 mg/dL for CRP. Among the patients, 12.2% were refractory to the first IVIG infusion, and 2.8% did not respond to the second IVIG treatment. Additionally, 13.1% of these patients had confirmed coronary artery dilatation (CAD) in the acute phase, and 4.7% developed CAD after the acute phase. Machine learning models effectively predict resistance to consecutive IVIG treatments, allowing for early identification of high-risk patients. Key predictors include ANC, serum protein, platelet count, and CRP levels. These findings can guide personalized treatment strategies and improve outcomes for Kawasaki Disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.