Observational studyPediatric cardiology2026
Printed Models for Better Prediction of Surgery in Patients with Double Outlet Right Ventricle.
Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mimicking Alveolar Lung Structures with Lattice Designs.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complex and variable anatomy of complex double outlet right ventricle makes it imperative to understand the spatial anatomic structures to determine whether it is feasible to repair the anomaly in a biventricular or univentricular fashion. Biventricular repair should be aimed for but is not always feasible. Choosing the correct surgical technique is of great importance in surgical planning of biventricular repair. Conventional imaging is typically insufficient to predict feasibility and technique of biventricular repair. The gap between virtual images and spatial reality can be filled using 3D prints. Retrospective observational study of all available imaging including 3D prints and operative reports in 13 patients. 3D-prints enabled accurate prediction of biventricular repair in 8 cases and of univentricular repair in 2 cases. In 2 patients, no precise prediction was possible. One 3D-print was created post repair. 3D-prints accurately predicted the optimal technique for achieving biventricular repair in 8 cases. Conventional imaging could not accurately predict biventricular repair of optimal surgical technique in any patient. In complex double outlet right ventricle, 3D-printing can predict feasibility of biventricular repair better than conventional imaging. Additionally, 3D-prints can predict the type of surgical technique better. 3D-printing is also helpful in preoperative discussion with parents, caretakers, and pediatric cardiologists. 3D-prints are strongly recommended in patients with complex double outlet right ventricle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.