Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762488›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-based estimation of crude oil-nitrogen interfacial tension.

Safia Obaidur Rab, Subhash Chandra, Abhinav Kumar, Pinank Patel, Mohammed Al-Farouni, Soumya V Menon, Bandar R Alsehli, Mamata Chahar, Manmeet Singh, Mahmood Kiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Safia Obaidur RabCentral Labs, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 960, AlQura'a, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Subhash ChandraDepartment of Electrical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
Abhinav KumarDepartment of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia.
Pinank PatelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University Research Center, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujarat, India.
Mohammed Al-FarouniDepartment of Computers Techniques Engineering, College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Soumya V MenonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Bandar R AlsehliDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, Medina, 30002, Saudi Arabia.
Mamata ChaharDepartment of Chemistry, NIMS Institute of Engineering & Technology, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Manmeet SinghDepartment of Applied Sciences, Chandigarh Engineering College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges-Jhanjeri, Mohali, 140307, Punjab, India.
Mahmood KianiYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, Iran. mahmoodkiani373@gmail.com.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University R.G.P.2/509/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of interfacial tension (IFT) between nitrogen and crude oil during nitrogen-based gas injection into oil reservoirs is imperative. The previous research works dealing with prediction of IFT of oil and nitrogen systems consider synthetic oil samples such n-alkanes. In this work, we aim to utilize eight machine learning methods of Decision Tree (DT), AdaBoost (AB), Random Forest (RF), K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), Ensemble Learning (EL), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network (MLP-ANN) to construct data-driven intelligent models to predict crude oil - nitrogen IFT based upon experimental data of real crude oils samples encountered in underground oil reservoirs. Several statistical indices and graphical approaches are used as accuracy performance indicators. The results show that virtually all the gathered datapoints are suitable for the purpose of model development. The sensitivity analysis indicated that pressure, temperature and crude oil API all negatively affect the IFT, with pressure being the most effective factor. The evaluation study proved that Random Forest is the most accurate developed intelligent model as it was characterized with acceptable R-squared (0.959), mean square error (1.65), average absolute relative error (6.85%) of unseen test datapoints as well as with correct trend prediction of IFT with regard to all input parameters of pressure, temperature and crude oil API. The developed model can be considered an accurate an easy-to-use tool for the prediction of crude oil/N

Indexed as

Crude oil – Nitrogen IFTMachine learningOutlier detectionSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39762488
PMCPMC11704299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.