ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Unveiling the dual role of biocolonization: a case study on the deterioration and preservation of sandstone monuments in Leshan Giant Buddha, China.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For large, open-air lithic cultural heritage, colonization is an inevitable process. This study examines the dual impact of colonization on the Leshan Giant Buddha's sandstone monuments, focusing on both biodeterioration and protection. Over three years, we conducted field surveys and monitored biocrusts (bryophytes, lichens, and biofilms) on these monuments, observing significant biodeterioration primarily due to mechanical exfoliation and acid corrosion. To assess the potential of biota in conserving sandstone monuments, we replicated biotic crust colonization on laboratory sandstone samples. In the laboratory, we observed biomineral formation, primarily calcium carbonate, on the rock specimen surfaces after two years. Comparative analysis with control samples showed that biocolonization notably changed the rock's hydrophobicity, surface hardness, and weight loss, indicating a protective effect. Further analyses using XRD, SEM-EDS, and transcriptomics identified carbonic anhydrase as a key enzyme in the biomineralization process. Our findings suggest that under controlled conditions, biocolonization can be steered towards bioprotection, offering new strategies for the in-situ preservation of open-air lithic cultural heritage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39762472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.