ArticleBrain topography2025
EEG Signals Classification Related to Visual Objects Using Long Short-Term Memory Network and Nonlinear Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Regression.
Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By gaining insights into how brain activity is encoded and decoded, we enhance our understanding of brain function. This study introduces a method for classifying EEG signals related to visual objects, employing a combination of an LSTM network and nonlinear interval type-2 fuzzy regression (NIT2FR). Here, ResNet is utilized for feature extraction from images, the LSTM network for feature extraction from EEG signals, and NIT2FR for mapping image features to EEG signal features. The application of type-2 fuzzy logic addresses uncertainties arising from EEG signal nonlinearity, noise, limited data sample size, and diverse mental states among participants. The Stanford database was used for implementation, evaluating effectiveness through metrics like classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. According to the findings, the LSTM network achieved an accuracy of 55.83% in categorizing images using raw EEG data. When compared to other methods like linear type-2, linear/nonlinear type-1 fuzzy, neural network, and polynomial regression, NIT2FR coupled with an SVM classifier outperformed with a 68.05% accuracy. Thus, NIT2FR demonstrates superiority in handling high uncertainty environments. Moreover, the 6.03% improvement in accuracy over the best previous study using the same dataset underscores its effectiveness. Precision, recall, and F1 score results for NIT2FR were 68.93%, 68.08%, and 68.49% respectively, surpassing outcomes from linear type-2, linear/nonlinear type-1 fuzzy regression methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39762447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.