Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762367›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025

Protein handling in kidney tubules.

Andrew M Hall

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Megalin: from structure to function.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Albuminuria or proteinuria in glomerular disease and CKD-which one to use?Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Toward Assessment of Tubular Function in Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew M HallInstitute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. andrew.hall@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-7892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kidney proximal tubule reabsorbs and degrades filtered plasma proteins to reclaim valuable nutrients and maintain body homeostasis. Defects in this process result in proteinuria, one of the most frequently used biomarkers of kidney disease. Filtered proteins enter proximal tubules via receptor-mediated endocytosis and are processed within a highly developed apical endo-lysosomal system (ELS). Proteinuria is a strong risk factor for chronic kidney disease progression and genetic disorders of the ELS cause hereditary kidney diseases, so deepening understanding of how the proximal tubule handles proteins is crucial for translational nephrology. Moreover, the ELS is both an entry point for nephrotoxins that induce tubular damage and a target for novel therapies to prevent it. Cutting-edge research techniques, such as functional intravital imaging and computational modelling, are shedding light on spatial and integrative aspects of renal tubular protein processing in vivo, how these are altered under pathological conditions and the consequences for other tubular functions. These insights have potentially important implications for understanding the origins of systemic complications arising in proteinuric states, and might lead to the development of new ways of monitoring and treating kidney diseases.

Indexed as

Kidney TubulesKidney Tubules, ProximalProteinuriaAnimalsHumansLysosomesRenal Insufficiency, Chronic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.