ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of ECG signals from ballistocardiography using deep learning for the unconstrained measurement of heartbeat intervals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contactless 12-lead electrocardiogram via deep computational radar.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Unconstrained deep learning-based sleep stage classification using cardiorespiratory and body movement activities in adults with suspected sleep apnea.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025Article
- Semantic ECG hash similarity graph.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a deep learning-based extraction of electrocardiographic (ECG) waves from ballistocardiographic (BCG) signals and explored their use in R-R interval (RRI) estimation. Preprocessed BCG and reference ECG signals were inputted into the bidirectional long short-term memory network to train the model to minimize the loss function of the mean squared error between the predicted ECG (pECG) and genuine ECG signals. Using a dataset acquired with polyvinylidene fluoride and ECG sensors in different recumbent positions from 18 participants, we generated pECG signals from preprocessed BCG signals using the learned model and evaluated the RRI estimation performance by comparing the predicted RRI with the reference RRI obtained from the ECG signal using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation scheme. A mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.034 s was achieved for the beat-to-beat interval accuracy. To further test the generalization ability of the learned model trained with a short-term-recorded dataset, we collected long-term overnight recordings of BCG signals from 12 different participants and performed validation. The beat-to-beat interval correlation between BCG and ECG signals was 0.82 ± 0.06 with an average MAE of 0.046 s, showing practical performance for long-term measurement of RRIs. These results suggest that the proposed approach can be used for continuous heart rate monitoring in a home environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.