ArticleScientific reports2025
Follow-up care needs and motivational factors for childhood cancer survivors and their parents in Germany.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survivorship Care After Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review of Reported Barriers and Facilitators.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Integrating optimal patient-centered care: patient- and family-reported experiences after complex treatment for rare diseases.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Organizing long-term follow-up care for pediatric cancer survivors: a socio-ecological approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the long-term follow-up needs and motivations of childhood and adolescent cancer survivors and their parents to attend follow-up care in Germany, given the inconsistent adherence to national follow-up guidelines. We developed interview guidelines based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the stereotype priming model to explore motivations and barriers related to follow-up care. We conducted a total of 36 episodic narrative interviews with adolescent (ages 13-17) and adult (ages 18-45) survivors of pediatric cancer, as well as their parents. We analyzed the transcripts qualitatively using thematic content analysis, while quantitative analysis through multiple regression models was used to support the qualitative findings and identify predictors of follow-up care attendance. We identified key themes across age groups, including a strong need to "return to normal life" and a desire for ongoing organizational and social support. Both survivors and parents highlighted specific needs, including timely, personalized health information and practical help with healthcare logistics. Adolescents particularly valued emotional support from their social circles, whereas adult survivors and parents expressed a need for more structured psychosocial and logistical assistance. The findings suggest that both age and the time elapsed since diagnosis play a role in affecting survivors' perceived control to attend guideline-based follow-up care. Our findings suggest that a differentiated approach to follow-up care, with age-appropriate support structures, and tailored guidelines, may improve adherence among survivors and their parents. To enhance follow-up care adherence among cancer survivors, healthcare providers could offer tailored, age-specific information and practical assistance with healthcare logistics. Additionally, providing emotional and psychosocial support resources for both survivors and their parents can help address their unique needs at different stages of recovery.Trial registration: Registered at German Clinical Trial Register (ID DRKS00025960 and DRKS00026092).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.