Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interpretable real-time monitoring of short-term rockbursts in underground spaces based on microseismic activities.

Mohammad Hossein Kadkhodaei, Ebrahim Ghasemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Hossein KadkhodaeiDepartment of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 8415683111, Iran. mh.kadkhodaei@mi.iut.ac.ir.
Ebrahim GhasemiDepartment of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 8415683111, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, two novel hybrid intelligent models were developed to evaluate the short-term rockburst using the random forest (RF) method and two meta-heuristic algorithms, whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA), for hyperparameter tuning. Real-time predictive models of this phenomenon were created using a database comprising 93 case histories, taking into account various microseismic parameters. The results indicated that the WOA achieved the highest overall performance in hyperparameter tuning for the RF model, outperforming the COA. RF-WOA model accurately predicted the occurrence of this phenomenon with an accuracy of 0.944. Additionally, for this model, precision, recall and F1-score were obtained as 0.950, 0.944 and 0.943, respectively, indicating that the proposed model is robust in predicting damage severity of rockburst in deep underground projects. Subsequently, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was employed to interpret and explain the prediction process and assess the influence of input features based on RF-WOA model. The results showed that three parameters including cumulative seismic energy, cumulative microseismic events, and cumulative apparent volume have the greatest impact on the occurrence of rockburst events. This study provides an interpretable and transparent resource for accurately predicting rockburst events in real time. It can facilitate estimating project costs, selecting a suitable support system, and identifying essential ways to limit the danger of rockburst.

Indexed as

Coati optimization algorithmMicroseismic monitoringRandom forestShort-term rockburstWhale optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID39762318
PMCPMC11704320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.