ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable real-time monitoring of short-term rockbursts in underground spaces based on microseismic activities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, two novel hybrid intelligent models were developed to evaluate the short-term rockburst using the random forest (RF) method and two meta-heuristic algorithms, whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA), for hyperparameter tuning. Real-time predictive models of this phenomenon were created using a database comprising 93 case histories, taking into account various microseismic parameters. The results indicated that the WOA achieved the highest overall performance in hyperparameter tuning for the RF model, outperforming the COA. RF-WOA model accurately predicted the occurrence of this phenomenon with an accuracy of 0.944. Additionally, for this model, precision, recall and F1-score were obtained as 0.950, 0.944 and 0.943, respectively, indicating that the proposed model is robust in predicting damage severity of rockburst in deep underground projects. Subsequently, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was employed to interpret and explain the prediction process and assess the influence of input features based on RF-WOA model. The results showed that three parameters including cumulative seismic energy, cumulative microseismic events, and cumulative apparent volume have the greatest impact on the occurrence of rockburst events. This study provides an interpretable and transparent resource for accurately predicting rockburst events in real time. It can facilitate estimating project costs, selecting a suitable support system, and identifying essential ways to limit the danger of rockburst.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.