ArticleScientific reports2025
Bioinspired surface structures for added shear stabilization in suction discs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidermal microstructures on the paired fins of marine sculpins suggest new functional hypotheses supporting benthic station-holding.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many aquatic organisms utilize suction-based organs to adhere to diverse substrates in unpredictable environments. For multiple fish species, these adhesive discs include a softer disc margin consisting of surface structures called papillae, which stabilize and seal on variable substrates. The size, arrangement, and density of these papillae are quite diverse among different species, generating complex disc patterns produced by these structures. Considering papillae arrangements in three fish species, the Northern Clingfish (Gobiesox maeandricus), Tidepool Snailfish (Liparis florae), and Chilean Clingfish (Sicyases sanguineus), we fabricated physical disc models that tested relevant surface pattern parameters under shear loading conditions. Parameters of interest included the area of papillae-like structures, the spacing between adjacent structures (channel spacing), and the percent coverage of elements relative to the total disc area. To create our models, a soft silicone elastomer was added to a stiff circular suction cup, which was then "stamped" using a laser-etched and thermoformed mold base to create the desired surface patterning. Discs were tested using a robotic arm equipped with a force sensor, which sheared them across smooth and rough surfaces at a fixed speed and distance. The arm was also used to vary the initial compression to test performance under both suction-dominant and friction-dominant preloads. For our designs, patterns with smaller papillae-like structures and channel spacing often produced higher peak forces than those with larger features. However, the design that withstood the highest shear load featured an intermediate pad size and channel spacing, potentially highlighting a balance between overall surface area and fluid channeling. Additionally, discs with surface patterns often outperformed the control discs (no pattern) on both smooth and rough surfaces, but performance was highly dependent on preload, with patterned discs exhibiting benefits with the higher "friction-dominant" preloads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.