Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762119›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Biomechanical Analysis and Solution Suggestions of Screw Replacement Scenarios in Femoral Neck Fracture Surgeries: Finite Element Method.

Yılmaz Güvercin, Murat Yaylacı, Ayberk Dizdar, Mehmet Emin Özdemir, Sevil Ay, Ecren Uzun Yaylacı, Umitcan Karahasanoğlu, Hüseyin Uygun, Gökhan Peker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yılmaz GüvercinDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1861-2083
Murat YaylacıBiomedical Engineering MSc Program, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-1685
Ayberk DizdarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-0831
Mehmet Emin ÖzdemirDepartment of Civil Engineering, Cankiri Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7983-7265
Sevil AyDepartment of Civil Engineering, Artvin Coruh University, Artvin, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3290-2343
Ecren Uzun YaylacıFaculty of Fisheries, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-2487
Umitcan KarahasanoğluDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-6663
Hüseyin UygunDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6473-0997
Gökhan PekerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-6645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite several surgical options, there has yet to be a consensus on the best treatment for femoral neck fracture (FNF) due to higher complication rates compared to other bone fractures. This study aims to examine the possible consequences and solution suggestions of changing screws during surgery for various reasons in FNF surgical treatment from a biomechanical perspective.

methodFNF and treatment materials were analyzed biomechanically using a package program based on the finite element method (FEM). This study created a solid model with images of femur bone tomography. Dynamic hip screws (DHS), cannulated screws (CCS), and medial buttress plates (MBP) were obtained by making three-dimensional designs. The required elements for the models were assigned, and the material properties of the elements were defined. The solutions were obtained as crack distance and deformation results after defining the boundary conditions and applying the necessary loading.

resultsThe strain and crack distance values created by six models on the fracture line under different parameters were obtained, and the numerical results were evaluated. The DHS and CCS models produced the highest crack distance and deformation values when all screws were loose. The lowest values were obtained in the intact-85 model when all CCS were tight. When the results are evaluated, it is seen that the MBP has a decreasing effect on the results. Mechanical evaluation of six different options used in femoral neck fractures was performed. 85 mm CCS applied to our standard model gave the best results, while the use of 80 mm CCS in the same model showed promising results compared to other models. It is understood that CCS have the best stability even in loosening models with the medial support plate. Different models are from intact-85 mm DHS+1CS+MBP to DHS+1CS, which was worked with LSR+USR-2, according to decreasing stability.

conclusionThis study offers various biomechanical solutions to possible intraoperative problems in FNF treatment. The following results were obtained from the study data. When the CCS needs to be lengthened or replaced, it is appropriate to use the CCS with the MBP. A single anti-rotation screw is sufficient for lag screw extensions of the DHS plate, and the MBP may be a savior procedure in surgery.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesFinite Element AnalysisHumansbiomechanicsfemoral neck fracturefinite element methodmedial buttress platesscrew

Identifiers

PMID39762119
PMCPMC11787977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.