Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39762106›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Key elements for designing effective second victim support interventions: a focus group study in European clinical settings.

José Joaquín Mira, Irene Carrillo, Eva Gil-Hernández, Reinhard Strametz, Hana Knežević Krajina, Katja Schrøder, Susanna Tella, Sofia Guerra Paiva, Bojana Knežević, Massimiliano Panella and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. The second victim phenomenon´s impact in male and female healthcare workers: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

José Joaquín MiraHealth Psychology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Spain jose.mira@umh.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-083X
Irene CarrilloHealth Psychology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-7284
Eva Gil-HernándezFISABIO, Elche, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-0503
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9920-8674
Hana Knežević KrajinaHealth Centre Zagreb Centar, Zagreb, Croatia.
Katja SchrøderDepartment of Public Health, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9100-7237
Susanna TellaHealth & Wellbeing, LAB University of Applied Sciences - Lappeenrannan kampus, Lappeenranta, Finland.
Sofia Guerra PaivaNational School of Public Health, NOVA university of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bojana KneževićUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Massimiliano PanellaTraslational Medicine, Amedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Deborah SeysDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care - Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-3879
Einav SruloviciUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Kaja PõllusteDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Kris VanhaechtDepartment of Public Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paulo SousaNational School of Public Health, NOVA university of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-6075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe second victim (SV) experience limits the performance of health and care workers and places patients at risk. Peer support is recognised as the most effective, feasible and acceptable intervention to mitigate its impact.

objectiveTo define a set of success factors when designing interventions to support SVs in health and care facilities based on expertise in different European countries.

settingInternational collaboration involving countries with diverse cultures, structures and legal frameworks.

designQualitative research.

methodFocus groups involving a total of 43 participants were conducted in five countries. Prominent professionals in European peer support interventions were engaged. Analysis of common elements considered key to the success of these programmes was underscored.

resultsCritical success factors for designing effective SV support interventions included the need for an occupational health approach, the establishment of a strong organisational safety culture, immediate psychological first aid, long-term resilience building, the engagement and training of peer supporters, the provision of adequate resources and ongoing support, the importance of leadership commitment and the necessity of tailoring interventions to the specific context and needs of each institution and country considering their diverse sociocultural and legal framework. The expected benefits included ensuring optimal patient care and reducing associated costs such as staff turnover and litigation.

conclusionEffective SV support interventions are essential for enhancing the resilience and performance of health and care workers, ultimately improving patient safety. By implementing tailored and well-resourced interventions, healthcare institutions can mitigate the negative impact of the SV phenomenon, promoting optimal care.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHealth PersonnelPeer GroupQualitative ResearchEuropeFemaleHumansMaleOccupational HealthOrganizational CultureSocial SupportBurnout, ProfessionalHealth & safetyOccupational Stress

Identifiers

PMID39762106
PMCPMC11749877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.