ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025
Can GastroPanel be used as a triage tool to select patients with advanced atrophic gastritis for gastroscopy? A prospective clinical validation study.
Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoimmune gastritis: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Serology and magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy for opportunistic screening of high-risk events in gastric cancer development: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is the 17th most common cancer in the UK with a 5-year survival rate of 22%. GastroPanel (Biohit Oyj; Helsinki, Finland) is an ELISA kit that measures pepsinogen I (PGI); pepsinogen II (PGII); gastrin-17 (G-17); and Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies (Hp IgG). PGI and the PGI/PGII ratio correlate inversely with the severity of chronic atrophic gastritis (AG). The aim of this study was to assess GastroPanel performance in the identification of moderate to severe AG in dyspepsia.
methodsIn this UK, single-centre, prospective diagnostic accuracy study, 324 patients [56.8% (n=184) female; median age 57 years (range 39-92 years)] were recruited for gastroscopy with biopsy and histology according to the updated Sydney System (USS). Blood (plasma) samples were collected for GastroPanel analysis. Paired samples were obtained from 268 patients [56.3% (n=151) female; median age=57 (range 39-92 years)]. GastroPanel results were interpreted using the GastroSoft app (Biohit).
resultsOverall agreement between GastroPanel and the USS classification was 90% (95% CI=86.7 to 93.8%), with a weighted kappa (κw) of 0.828 (95% CI=0.781 to 0.865). In receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, using moderate/severe atrophic gastritis of the corpus (AGC2+) as the endpoint, AUC=0.840 (95% CI 0.630 to 1.000) and 0.960 (95% CI 0.907 to 1.000) for PGI and the PGI/PGII ratio, respectively.
conclusionGastroPanel is a reliable dyspepsia triage test distinguishing patients who can be safely treated conservatively from those with moderate to severe corpus atrophic gastritis at high risk of developing GAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.