ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Quality improvement on reducing neonatal mortality through intensive Clinical Mentorship Intervention: a case study in Biak Regional Hospital, Papua-Indonesia.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Very low birth weight infant outcomes in a resource-limited setting: a five-year follow-up study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe neonatal mortality rate in Papua Province of Indonesia is unacceptably high. To address the issue, the Ministry of Health and UNICEF Indonesia initiated a hospital mentoring programme from 2014 to 2016 to improve the quality of care and health workers' capacity to provide neonatal care. This study aimed to assess the impact of hospital mentoring on neonatal mortality.
methodsThe study was conducted at Biak District Hospital, Indonesia. The neonatal mortality was compared for three periods: preintervention (2011-2013), mentorship intervention phase (2014-2016) and postintervention (2017-2020). The mentoring programme is a combination of a direct-intensive-regular mentoring process and a scholarship programme for paediatricians. In the mentoring process, paediatricians, neonatal nurses and electromedical staff from national hospitals were sent to train the nurses on nursing management for sick neonates, clinical neonatal resuscitation, stabilisation and transportation. The neonatal mortality data were collected from birth registers, medical records, death case review reports and mentoring programme reports.
resultsA significant decrease in the percentage of death cases before 24 hours of hospitalisation and death cases due to asphyxia was observed in the three periods. In the death cases from referrals, a significant decrease from 70% in the intervention period to 39.7% in the postintervention period was observed (p<0.05). The survival rate of neonates with body weights under 1500 g and 1500-2500 g was compared in the intervention and postintervention period, a significant increase from 21% to 58% and 55% to 94% was observed, respectively (p<0.05).
conclusionThe direct-intensive-regular mentoring intervention programme was found to be effective in reducing neonatal mortality through quality improvement in low-resource district hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.