ArticleNeuroImage2025
qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field modeling.
Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of planar cortical magnification with optimal transport and topological smoothing.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Uncertainty in population receptive field estimates revealed by variational qPRF.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2026Article
- Quantification of retinotopic maps with a Gaussian process modeling.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Hierarchical Bayesian augmented Hebbian reweighting model of perceptual learning.Journal of vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BOLD response can be fitted using the population receptive field (PRF) model to reveal how visual input is represented on the cortex (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008). Fitting the PRF model costs considerable time, often requiring days to analyze BOLD signals for a small cohort of subjects. We introduce the qPRF ("quick PRF"), a system for accelerated PRF modeling that reduced the computation time by a factor >1,000 without losing goodness-of-fit when compared to another widely available PRF modeling package (Kay et al., 2013) on a benchmark of data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP; Van Essen et al. (2013). The system achieves this level of acceleration by pre-computing a tree-like data structure, which it rapidly searches during the fitting step for an optimal parameter combination. We tested the method on a constrained four-parameter version of the PRF model (Strategy 1 herein) and an unconstrained five-parameter PRF model, which the qPRF fitted at comparable speed (Strategy 2). We show how an additional search step can guarantee optimality of qPRF solutions with little additional time cost (Strategy 3). To assess the quality of qPRF solutions, we compared our Strategy 1 solutions to those provided by Benson et al. (2018) who performed a similar four-parameter fit. Both hemispheres of the 181 subjects in the HCP dataset (a total of 10,753,572 vertices, each with a unique BOLD time series of 1800 frames) were analyzed by qPRF in 12.82 h on an ordinary CPU. The absolute difference in R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.