Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39761566›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Examining Intersectionality and Barriers to the Uptake of Video Consultations Among Older Adults From Disadvantaged Backgrounds With Limited English Proficiency: Qualitative Narrative Interview Study.

Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laiba HusainDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-0889
Trisha GreenhalghDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-8088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid shift to video consultation services during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about exacerbating existing health inequities, particularly for disadvantaged populations. Intersectionality theory provides a valuable framework for understanding how multiple dimensions of disadvantage interact to shape health experiences and outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims to explore how multiple dimensions of disadvantage-specifically older age, limited English proficiency, and low socioeconomic status-intersect to shape experiences with digital health services, focusing on video consultations.

methodsFollowing familiarization visits and interviews with service providers, 17 older people with multiple markers of disadvantage (older age, low socioeconomic status, and limited English proficiency) were recruited in the Redbridge borough of London. Data collection included narrative interviews and ethnographic observations during home visits. Field notes captured participants' living conditions, family dynamics, and technological arrangements. Guided by intersectionality theory and digital capital concepts, interviews explored participants' experiences accessing health care remotely. Intersectional narrative analysis was used to identify key themes and examine how different forms of disadvantage interact. We developed theoretically informed narrative portraits and user personas to synthesize findings.

resultsAnalysis revealed that the digitalization of health care can exacerbate existing inequities, erode trust, compound oppression, and reduce patient agency for multiply disadvantaged patient populations. Examining intersectionality illuminated how age, language proficiency, and socioeconomic status interact to create unique barriers and experiences. Key themes included the following: weakened presence in digital interactions, erosion of therapeutic relationships, shift from relational to distributed continuity, increased complexity leading to disorientation, engagement shaped by previous experiences of discrimination, and reduced patient agency.

conclusionsThis study provides critical insights into how the digitalization of health care can deepen disparities for older patients with low income and limited English proficiency. By applying intersectionality theory to digital health disparities, our findings underscore the need for multifaceted approaches to digital health equity that address the complex interplay of disadvantage. Recommendations include co-designing inclusive digital services, strengthening relational continuity, and developing targeted support to preserve agency and trust for marginalized groups in an increasingly digital health care landscape.

Indexed as

COVID-19Limited English ProficiencyQualitative ResearchVulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedNarrationSARS-CoV-2Telemedicinedigital capitaldigital health disparitieshealth inequityintersectionalitymobile phonevideo consultations

Identifiers

PMID39761566
PMCPMC11747529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.