ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Concurrent myelomeningocele and sagittal craniosynostosis: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyelomeningocele and sagittal craniosynostosis are 2 neurosurgical pathologies with complications such as increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and hydrocephalus. While the 2 defects commonly occur independently, their simultaneous occurrence is exceptionally rare. OBSERVATIONS: The authors report the case of a newborn male diagnosed with a simultaneous myelomeningocele and sagittal craniosynostosis. The patient underwent surgical repair of the myelomeningocele 2 days after birth. Wound breakdown and ventriculomegaly were observed 13 days after birth. Surgical wound repair was performed, and a neonatal reservoir was inserted because of concerns for wound healing and increased ICP. The reservoir was tapped daily, and the ventricle size was monitored via biweekly ultrasounds. Due to the increased risk of ICP presented by the sagittal craniosynostosis, an open strip craniectomy was performed at 34 days of life. Following surgery, cranial ultrasound studies demonstrated improving ventricle size and neonatal reservoir tapping was spaced to weekly. The patient was discharged at 68 days of life in stable condition, with no permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion needed at the 8-month follow-up. LESSONS: Surgical repair of sagittal craniosynostosis in the presence of a myelomeningocele should be considered earlier in life than generally indicated to limit the risk of developing elevated ICP, hydrocephalus, and subsequent complications. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24616.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.