ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025
After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery, Variables Associated With Returning to the Same Surgeon If a Subsequent Antrior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Is Needed?
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLrs) unfortunately can require revision ACLr, or contralateral ACLr may be indicated (together subsequent ACLr). This study aimed to examine the rate of and factors associated with returning to the same surgeon.
methodsPatients who underwent ACLr and subsequent ACLr within 3 years were abstracted from the PearlDiver database. Patient factors and surgical factors were examined. Factors independently associated with changing the surgeon were examined.
resultsOverall, 63,582 ACLr patients were identified with 2,823 (4.4%) having a subsequent ACLr. These subsequent ACLrs were performed by the same surgeon for 1,329 (47.1%) and by a different surgeon for 1,494 (52.9%). Factors independently associated with changing surgeons were 90-day adverse events after index surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.95), longer time to second surgery (OR 1.61), and second surgery on the ipsilateral knee (OR 1.28). Notably, sex, comorbidity, depression, psychoses, and insurance plan were not correlated with choosing changing surgeons.
conclusionOver half of the patients who required a subsequent ACLr changed surgeons. Changing surgeons was associated with adverse events after index surgery, ipsilateral revisions, longer time to surgery, and patient age. However, there should be confidence that the other assessed factors were not associated with the decision to change surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.