ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Benchmark of Density Functional Theory in the Prediction of
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Electric Fields on NMR Properties of Imidazole and Pyrrole Under.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2026Article
- Residual Chemical Shift Anisotropies in the Structure Determination of Small Molecules.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2026Review
- NMRexp: A database of 3.3 million experimental NMR spectra.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A SERS/bFQICA/Colorimetric triple-mode LFIA method for rapid quantitative detection of meropenem.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Deciphering Dickerson-Drew DNA Equilibrium beyond the BI/BII DNA Dichotomy by Interpretation ofJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have emerged as a powerful theoretical toolbox for interpreting and analyzing the experimental nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of chemical compounds. While DFT has been extensively used and benchmarked for isotropic NMR observables, the evaluation of the full chemical shielding tensor, which is necessary for interpreting residual chemical shift anisotropy (RCSA), has received much less attention, despite its recent applications in the structural elucidation of organic molecules. In this study, we present a comprehensive benchmark of carbon shielding anisotropies based on coupled cluster reference tensors taken from the NS372 benchmark data set. Additionally, we investigate the representation of the DFT-predicted shielding tensors, such as the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Moreover, we evaluated how various DFT methods influence the discrimination of possible relative configurations using recently published ΔΔRCSA data for a set of structurally diverse natural products. Our findings demonstrate that accurate interpretation of RCSAs for configurational and conformational analysis is possible with semilocal DFT methods, which also reduce computational demands compared to hybrid functionals such as the commonly used B3LYP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.