ArticleHarvard review of psychiatry
Pain Catastrophizing and Substance Misuse: A Scoping Review of the Literature.
Article in Harvard review of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impulsivity and pain attentional bias in veterans receiving care for chronic non-malignant pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pain Catastrophizing: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Pharmacological and behavioral pain treatment strategies for patients with opioid use disorder.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain catastrophizing, or the interpretation of pain as unbearable or intolerable, can increase pain-related anxiety and severity. High levels of pain catastrophizing have also been linked to substance use, particularly for substances with analgesic properties. Importantly, behavioral treatments can reduce pain catastrophizing, making them promising interventions for mitigating pain-related substance use. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize literature investigating the relationship between pain catastrophizing and substance use in adults.
methodsWe performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Included articles had both a measurement of pain catastrophizing and substance use, and reported analyses characterizing the relationship between the two.
resultsOf the 341 abstracts identified, 47 articles met eligibility criteria. Most studies focused on people with chronic pain. Some studies also considered samples with substance use disorders (with and without chronic pain) or acute pain, and general population samples. There was generally a positive association between pain catastrophizing and substance misuse; this association was consistent across multiple samples and substances. Most studies were cross-sectional, although associations were also detected in longitudinal studies. The magnitude of associations tended to be stronger for higher severity substance use and more proximal tests of association. More longitudinal and experimental studies are needed, however, to better delineate these effects. DISCUSSION: Findings indicate a consistent positive association between pain catastrophizing and substance use, highlighting the potential for interventions targeting pain catastrophizing to reduce negative substance-related consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.