Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39761405›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Utilizing Martian samples for future planetary exploration-Characterizing hazards and resources.

Charles Whetsel, Joel S Levine, Stephen J Hoffman, Clare M Luckey, Kevin D Watts, Erik L Antonsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Martian samples, hazards, and biosecurity: Between science and bioethics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Reply to Siqueira-Batista and Gómez: Underscoring the importance of biosafety for the return of Martian samples.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. The scientific value of Mars Sample Return.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Perspectives on Mars Sample Return: A critical resource for planetary science and exploration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles WhetselMoon to Mars Support Office, Planetary Sciences Directorate, Jet Propulsion Laboratory-California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91011.ORCID 0009-0004-0425-3264
Joel S LevineDepartment of Applied Science, William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187.ORCID 0009-0006-3384-0438
Stephen J HoffmanEngineering and Technology Group, The Aerospace Corporation, Houston, TX 77058.
Clare M LuckeyExploration Mission Planning Office, Exploration Integration and Science Directorate, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058.
Kevin D WattsExploration Mission Planning Office, Exploration Integration and Science Directorate, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058.
Erik L AntonsenDivision of Space, Ecological, Arctic, and Resource-limited (SPEAR) Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-7011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most surprising and important findings of the first human landings on the Moon was the discovery of a very fine layer of lunar dust covering the entire surface of Moon along with the negative impacts of this dust on the well-being and operational effectiveness of the astronauts, their equipment, and instrumentation. The United States is now planning for human missions to Mars, a planet where dust can also be expected to be ubiquitous for many or most landing sites. For these missions, the design and operations of key hardware systems must take this dust into account, especially when related to crew health and safety. Improved understanding of Martian dust characteristics can inform its potential to also perform transport of microorganisms, both those inadvertently brought to Mars by the astronauts, or, if Martian microorganisms exist, the potential for their inadvertent return to Earth with the astronauts. Careful planning and design are needed to assure that future missions do not violate the United Nations Outer Space Treaty (1967) signed by all spacefaring nations. In this paper, we review the impact of lunar dust on the Apollo missions and identify several questions about dust in the atmosphere of Mars that may be answered by the curated samples that would be returned by the planned Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign. These answers would not only provide an opportunity to better understand the history of Mars but could also reduce uncertainty in charting the future of humanity's exploration of the planet.

Indexed as

ExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentMarsSpace FlightAstronautsCosmic DustDustHumansMoonUnited StatesCosmic DustDustexplorationMarsspaceflight

Identifiers

PMID39761405
PMCPMC11745335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.