ArticleACS nano2025
Engineering the Thermal and Energy-Storage Properties in Quantum Dots Using Dominant Faceting: The Case Study of Silicon.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The storage and release of energy is an economic cornerstone. In quantum dots (QDs), energy storage is mostly governed by their surfaces, in particular by surface chemistry and faceting. The impact of surface free energy (SFE) through surface faceting has already been studied in QDs. Here, we introduce dominant faceting representing the structural order of the surface. In particular, we propose that realistic QDs attain complicated polyhedral quasi-spherical shapes while keeping the dominance of a certain type of facet. The type of dominant facet determines the rates of surface-related processes. Therefore, by connecting dominant faceting with SFE, trends analogical to bulk material are kept despite the lack of evident microscopic shape control. To demonstrate the applicability of dominant faceting, we synthesize sets of silicon QDs with sizes around 5 nm and classify them based on increasing SFE of the corresponding analytic geometrical models, using a detailed surface chemistry analysis. Total energies released during oxidation of the synthesized QDs reach the theoretical limit, unlike in the reference, "large" (>100 nm) silicon nanoparticles, which release about 15% less energy. Next, we perform a comprehensive experimental study of dehydrogenation and thermal oxidation of the synthesized QDs in the temperature range of 25-1100 °C, identifying SFE as the key factor determining their thermal stability and surface reactivity. In particular, four distinctive stages of energy release were observed with onset temperatures ranging between 140 and 250 °C, ≈500 and 650-700 °C, respectively, for the SFE-differing samples. Finally, the thermal oxidation of the synthesized QDs is completed at lower temperatures with increasing SFE, decreasing from 1065 to 970 °C and being > 150 °C lower in QDs than in the larger reference nanoparticles. Therefore, despite a rich mixture of features, our description based on linking dominant faceting with SFE allows us to fully explain all the observed trends, demonstrating both the potential of SFE-based engineering of energy-storage properties in QDs and the prospects of silicon QDs as an energy-storage material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.