ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2024
Self-care concept for people with elimination ostomy: a scoping review.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Management Assessment Instruments for Adults with Colorectal Cancer-Related Intestinal Stomas: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- The impact of stigma on post-traumatic growth in patients with enterostomy: the chain mediating effect of coping styles and self-care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the literature for terminology, classifications, and factors influencing the adoption of self-care in people with an elimination ostomy.
methodScoping review, according to JBI methodology and, for structuring the article, the extension of the PRISMA checklist. The search included studies from 2018 to 2023, in four databases, with specific descriptors and alternative terms. Two reviewers selected the sample based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, using the software Rayyan®. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework.
resultsEight studies were included, which presented differences in the scope of the concept and classification of self-care. Names such as capacity, index, and level were used. Four tools were identified for assessing self-care. The factors that positively influenced self-care were female sex, being young, married, higher education level, pasty effluent, demarcation, social support, and education. Those influencing negatively were stress, complications, and inadequate care.
conclusionThe concept of self-care for people with elimination ostomies is not standardized and is most often reduced to procedural self-care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.